The products/features (mentioned herein) are not commercially available in all countries. Their future availability cannot be guaranteed.
The statements by Siemens Healthineers customers described herein are based on results that were achieved in the customer’s unique setting. Since there is no “typical” hospital and many variables exist (e.g., hospital size, case mix, level of IT adoption) there can be no guarantee that other customers will achieve the same results.
1 Lloyd W. Klein et al., Occupational health hazards of interventional cardiologists in the current decade: Results of the 2014 SCAI membership survey, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015
2 Weisz G, et al. Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: PRECISE Study. J American College of Cardiol, 2013
3 Gregory Dehmer et al. Occupational Hazards for Interventional Cardiologists, The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, 68 Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 974, 975 (2006)
4 National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States. Bethesda, MD National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, (2009) 160.
5 International Atomic Energy Agency, Radiation Protection for Patients (RPOP) “X-rays: What Patients Need to Know” www.rpopliaea.org.
6 Brent James et al. Five steps every hospital CEO should start today, Siemens Healthineers Insights Series 2019
7 McKinsey Global Institute, Where Machines Could Replace Humans And Where They Can’t Yet, 2016
8 Fazel R, Curtis J, Wang Y, Einstein AJ, et al. Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Insights from the NCDR®. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013
9 Campbell PT, et al. The Impact of Precise Robotic Lesion Length Measurement on Stent Length Selection: Ramification for stent savings. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015
10 https://www.porsche-consulting.com/de/medien/pressemitteilungen/detail/patienten-wuerdensich-auch-vom-roboter-operieren-lassen-1/#image-1
11 2021 NSI National Health Care Retention & RN Staffing Report
12 International Federation of Robotics (IFR), World Robotics Report 2020, BIS Research
13 Corindus sponsored survey of 50 interventional cardiologists to better understand physicians’ awareness and perceptions of occupational hazards in interventional cardiology (data on file)
14 Vano E et al. Radiation-associated lens opacities in catheterization personnel: results of a survey and direct assessments. 24 Journal of Vascular Interventional Radiology 2: 197-204 (2013).
15 Syed F et al., Complex Coronary Artery Lesions. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan
16 Madder R, et al. 2017. Disclaimers: Compared to robotic wiring without automation, preclinical study data may not be predictive of clinical results
17 Costa M A, Impact of stent deployment procedural factors on long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (final results of the multicenter prospective STLLR trial), *American Journal of Cardiology 2008
18 Nairooz R, Parzynski CS, Curtis JP, Mohsen A, McNulty E, Uretsky BF, Hakeem A. Contemporary Trends, Predictors and Outcomes of Perforation During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From the NCDR Cath PCI Registry). Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.014. Epub 2020